Since I was corresponding with Ranch Redo over her bathtub dilemma, I realized that I haven't been fully disclosing the variety of housing styles within walking distance of our neighborhood. We have LOTS of mid-century modern houses around, scattered among the bungalows. Many of these houses have never been seen by lifelong Chicagoans who don't venture this far north in the city OR skip us entirely on the way to Evanston and beyond.
I'm talking about Budlong Woods...a neighborhood as unknown as North Park itself. (Lincolnwood is a suburb within blocks of us which is also saturated with mid-century modern, but I'll write about that another time.)
Aaron and I loaded Grace into the stroller early Saturday morning and took a long walk so I could practice my photography skills and so we could gawk. I'll be publishing the results of our mid-century expedition in a few installments.
It seems to me that Mid-Century Modern finished what the Bungalow movement had started in its rejection of elaborate ornamentation (most notably associated with the Victorian style). It embraced more modern materials, such as plastic, aluminum and glass.
What do I see when I look at this architectural style?

I see some of the same boxes and rectangles that I associate with the Craftsman bungalow, but I also see lots of angles. Many times these angles will be tilting in the opposite direction of where they would be traveling on a more traditional house, creating an elegant asymmetry.
I see triangles, diamonds, and starburst patterns. Glass block. Concrete.
I see the influence of the Prarie-style in boxy construction...


The asymmetry is what pulls the style over the line from bungalow to mid-century modern for me. But I'm speaking intuitively here and not from any formal architectural design knowledge.
Aaron and I have been seeing a steady increase in the number of housebloggers purchasing more modern housing, and we also see modern styles reflected in consumer style trends.
(See West Elm, Chiasso, Dwell, design*sponge, jetsetmodern)
Why? There are probably many reasons but, as a houseblogger in Chicago, I tend to think that form follows function :) Bungalows were affordable, then cutting edge, then fashionable, then hot. Now, many bungalow neighborhoods are priced out of the reach of the first time homebuyer. What is still affordable? Middle class and blue collar Chicago neighborhoods with housing stock from the 1940's and 1950's. If this trend continues, you'll see the 60's and 70's become hot again next. (In fact, that is what many auctioneers are counting on.) Split-levels will be all of the rage.
And when the 80's officially become vintage? I will poke out my eyes with a sharp stick because that was high school for me. Someone else's high style will emerge out of my teenage fashion nightmare.
But, isn't that how things always seem to develop? Sigh.
|
| Search for more on 'Mid-Century Modern in Chicago' on this site. |
| Search for 'Mid-Century Modern in Chicago' on on other houseblogs like this one. |
| Search for 'Mid-Century Modern in Chicago' on Google. |
|
| Search for 'Mid-Century Modern in Chicago' on Amazon.com. |
 
Cabinet Refacing:
Face Your Kitchen | Your Guide to Kitchen Cabinet Refacing
 
 
 
|
Comments
Yikes- thinking about some of the 70's architecture is bad enough for me, but I can't even picture what 80's architecture would be... the music just starts playing in my head and before I know it I'll be singing "Ebony and Ivory" or something like it!
Posted by: Trissa | June 5, 2006 2:40 PM
Great information. The prairie-style you posted is to-die-for! As a ranch owner, I've been curiously following the slow rise in popularity of mid-century modern and ranches, just within the past year. First, I agree bungalows are out of the price-range of most new homebuyers. And, that is especially true if you live in the Northwest, where bungalows seem to mostly be concentrated to big cities, let's face it, not that many people lived in Oregon in the 30's. Also, I've read a few articles that say homes that are popular are usually the homes of one's grandparents, and not their parents. So, my grandparents both currently live in ranches, and in fact my gramma lives in the ranch house my grampa built in the 50's. Although I think Bungalows are beautiful, there is definitely something very cozy about ranches for me, perhaps because it reminds me of summers at gramma's? Also, I think the ranches built in the 50's really are as high a quality as the bungalow built in the 20's and 30's (without the beautiful woodwork in the bungalow). It'll be curious to see what becomes of 70's&80's homes, only because "affordable" and mass houses of the time were not quality built. It seems to me, to get a quality new house today, you really have to be among the top 10% of the US population (I read that the top 10% has an income of 100k or more per year). What will that mean for the popularity of the style in succeeding years?
Posted by: Laurie | June 5, 2006 5:23 PM
Your analysis of the trends makes a lot of sense. I guess the next wave of housebloggers will complain about POs ripping out original wood paneling and avocado appliances.
Posted by: Kristin | June 6, 2006 11:19 AM
**eyeballs Kristin suspiciously**
Girl, don't you even think of touching my 1960's Sears double oven! Hmmmph.
Posted by: kitschywoman | June 7, 2006 11:30 AM